Message-ID: <3704263.1075856522696.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 03:23:00 -0800 (PST)
From: vince.kaminski@enron.com
To: li.sun@enron.com
Subject: RE: EOL competitors
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Vince J Kaminski
X-To: Li Sun
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Vincent_Kaminski_Jun2001_4\Notes Folders\'sent mail
X-Origin: Kaminski-V
X-FileName: vkamins.nsf

Li,

Can you forward it to the team.

Vince





Li Sun@ENRON
01/29/2001 11:19 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: RE: EOL competitors


---------------------- Forwarded by Li Sun/NA/Enron on 01/29/2001 11:18 AM 
---------------------------
From: Drew Ries/ENRON@enronXgate on 01/29/2001 11:15 AM
To: Li Sun/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:  

Subject: RE: EOL competitors

Li,

Globally there are probably over 80 "competitors" to EOL.  None of these 
competitors have a meaningful market share.  Some of the names that jump to 
mind are the following, but it should be easy to find others by surfing the 
web.  Good luck.

Drew

Dynergy Direct
Houston Street
Altra
True Quote
Intercontinental Exchange
eNYMEX
Coral Connect
Koch Energy
epetroleum.com
Red Meteor
Trade Spark
American Petroleum Exchange
Fuel Spot





